Useration the widence. They
adapur. 252 79
would act home to
committed thimbles and falsely
"
Evidence "in
(Lee portion of
Aservations
(These numbers.}
4. That he does not understand the
Taxation; he is not guided
principles of
by any depicte principles, and is therefre of fixation;
not consistent in being method,
he is int sufficiently repainted with the reale of fees, and does not properly follame the scale. (Lee Answers + Questions 577, 605-608, 622-628, 696-723,733-799,879-891, 928-931.)
$77. This is mere brostful languele hey tring officer is liable shave his with, reviewed. The Judge certainly
wverride in volan tweedy.
whatten
whether rights for wingly
e Camer
Un Rafisher
wingly to. His decisin stands chainst the taxing offices althingh the taxing officers view of
the wetter
unakany
the Judges wring.
Soliciting
be cutirely correct.
the thing have there were
charides
: we hide
Comse supported my contention I still maintain theat
པ་་
topatian
by the wrect one. Let hom. wise so
anything he likes the century. officer hin a right this spinions, an
Brick buil.
605_608. ho proof - unsupported, and coming perm
a who like
m. Grist
einmy
when they been most insolent time. office in Registics is valueless.
(Lae further
Berations
"In bridence "In reference there
numbers.)
622, no lindence.
...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.